Integrative Pediatrics

(on barnes)
Doctors in Portland, OR
Doctors

Hours

Monday
8:00AM - 5:00PM
Tuesday
8:00AM - 5:00PM
Wednesday
8:00AM - 5:00PM
Thursday
8:00AM - 5:00PM
Friday
8:00AM - 5:00PM
Saturday
Closed
Sunday
Closed

Location

11790 SW Barnes Rd
Portland, OR
97225

About

Integrative Pediatrics is committed to bringing our patients and their parents the best blend of traditional, complementary, alternative and holistic medicine – from infancy to adulthood.

We believe in: ​
- treating your infants, children and adolescents like our own.
- individualized immunization schedules.
avoiding antibiotics and medications unless absolutely necessary.
- maximizing nutrition to enhance the body’s own natural healing and wellness.
- preventing illness by avoiding toxins such as pesticides, plastics and heavy metals.
- partnering with parents to bring their children the best options from traditional, alternative and complementary medicine.

Your Children Deserve The Best That Health Care Has to Offer!

Photos

Integrative Pediatrics Photo

Latest

On Monday the 7th of September we will be closed in observance of Labor Day. We will resume normal business hours Tuesday September 8th.
MESSENGER Integrative Pediatrics updated their business hours.
Integrative Pediatrics updated their address.
New article gives solid advice on what to do at home if you get COVID-19: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934320306732 SCIENCEDIRECT.COM Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection
The truth about how we got where we are with COVID-19 DRMALCOLMKENDRICK.ORG Dr. Malcolm Kendrick
LINK.MEDIUM.COM Vaccine Fundamentalism
Dear Patients at Integrative Pediatrics, It has become necessary to keep the information on this page consistent with standard guidelines. We want insurance companies, the State Medical Board and the Health Department to be confident that Integrative Pediatrics is mainstream and follows standards of care. We honor informed consent but are clear that the CDC vaccine schedule is the recommended schedule. Obviously, in a one on one consultation face to face, patients will always get a straight answer from our team. The personal views or opinions of Dr. Paul, Paul Thomas MD and The Vaccine-Friendly Plan book are merely educational and informational and not intended to diagnose or treat nor are they intended to be anything other than a personal opinion. For information related to vaccines and other controversial topics I recommend you follow me on my other pages and here: https://www.facebook.com/TheVaccineFriendlyPlan The Vaccine-Friendly Plan
Want your baby to develp asthma or recurrent wheezing? Just supplement with cows milk formula in the first 3 days of life and don't supplement your infant with vitamin D3. I have found it takes 1000 IU daily to have your newborn / infant get normal or optimal vitamin D3 levels. Please avoid cow milk formula for your newborn. If you have access to safe human donor milk - that would be the idea supplement to use should you need it. Babies are born with the nutrient profile of their mom. If you are considering getting pregnant, or are pregnant or nursing, I have formulated the most complete prenatal with just what you need. aach day you pull out a packet that has all the right stuff including 2000 IU vitamin D3, a highly absorbable form of fish oil high in DHA that your babies developing brain needs, choline and all the vitmains and minerals you should be optimizing. Get your DrPaulApproved Prenatal Complete: https://shop.drpaulapproved.com JAMANETWORK.COM Effect of Avoiding Cow’s Milk Formula at Birth on Prevention of Asthma or Recurrent Wheeze
Would you sign up your child for the experimental COVID-19 vaccines? Don't worry I'm not asking you to. CHILDRENSHEALTHDEFENSE.ORG Why Are Parents Enrolling Their Kids in Experimental COVID Vaccine Trials? • Children's Health Defense Paul Thomas November 20 at 9:49 PM · Imagine signing up your child - who is not at risk for severe COVID-19 disease - to participate in a DNA-altering vaccine trial that wasn't even done in animals? If your child dies or has chronic autoimmune or developmental issues do you just accept that it is a coincidence? That is likely what you will be told since we have no long-term safety data and probably will never get long term safety data that compares totally unvaccinated children to those who get this experimental vaccine. Parents, if you are done having children, I suggest you or the children's grandparents sign up for experimental vaccine trials and not a child who cannot protect themselves nor make the decision for themselves. As perspective - I have a clinic with about 10,000 active pediatric patients. We have had not a single case of COVID-19 walk through our doors, in this past year of COVID-19! Zero hospitalizations, Zero deaths. I'm aware of three children who tested positive but recovered after mild symptoms, never needing to be seen in the office (one went to an urgent care, two tested at testing sites). I hope these vaccines end up being fairly effective and provide actual protection from serious infection for the duration of the cold and flu season during which COVID-19 risk is greatest. I hope these vaccines end up being safe. We cannot know the answer to either of those questions until we have lived through the next few months. The precautionary principle would guide us not to cause potential harm, especially to children who are basically not at risk of serious COVID-19. The elderly, who are clearly at greatest risk of death from COVID-19, should absolutely be taking the risk since they also have the greatest need of the potential benefit. If it doesn't go well - at least they can say they tried to protect their children and grandchildren by being the first to take the experimental vaccines.
Imagine signing up your child - who is not at risk for severe COVID-19 disease - to participate in a DNA-altering vaccine trial that wasn't even done in animals? If your child dies or has chronic autoimmune or developmental issues do you just accept that it is a coincidence? That is likely what you will be told since we have no long-term safety data and probably will never get long term safety data that compares totally unvaccinated children to those who get this experimental vaccine. Parents, if you are done having children, I suggest you or the children's grandparents sign up for experimental vaccine trials and not a child who cannot protect themselves nor make the decision for themselves. As perspective - I have a clinic with about 10,000 active pediatric patients. We have had not a single case of COVID-19 walk through our doors, in this past year of COVID-19! Zero hospitalizations, Zero deaths. I'm aware of three children who tested positive but recovered after mild symptoms, never needing to be seen in the office (one went to an urgent care, two tested at testing sites). I hope these vaccines end up being fairly effective and provide actual protection from serious infection for the duration of the cold and flu season during which COVID-19 risk is greatest. I hope these vaccines end up being safe. We cannot know the answer to either of those questions until we have lived through the next few months. The precautionary principle would guide us not to cause potential harm, especially to children who are basically not at risk of serious COVID-19. The elderly, who are clearly at greatest risk of death from COVID-19, should absolutely be taking the risk since they also have the greatest need of the potential benefit. If it doesn't go well - at least they can say they tried to protect their children and grandchildren by being the first to take the experimental vaccines. CHILDRENSHEALTHDEFENSE.ORG Why Are Parents Enrolling Their Kids in Experimental COVID Vaccine Trials? • Children's Health Defense
Get your signed copy of my COVID-19 book at the office and receive a free insert of a US medical school protocol that is transforming outcomes for the severe cases. MEDSCAPE.COM Melatonin Could Potentially Treat COVID-19, Study Says Paul Thomas November 12 at 6:34 PM · Another study on the benefits of melatonin with COVID. For more on how to minimize the chances of severe COVID -19 - get your copy of my book (the one Amazon wouldn't publish) here: https://www.lulu.com/en/us/shop/paul-thomas-md/covid-19/paperback/product-vmngq6.html E-book (COVID-19 book) use: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/1018202
Paul Thomas November 12 at 6:34 PM · Another study on the benefits of melatonin with COVID. For more on how to minimize the chances of severe COVID -19 - get your copy of my book (the one Amazon wouldn't publish) here: https://www.lulu.com/en/us/shop/paul-thomas-md/covid-19/paperback/product-vmngq6.html E-book (COVID-19 book) use: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/1018202
From the CDC. A bit of clarity no the facemask issue. WWWNC.CDC.GOV Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures Paul Thomas November 2 at 3:04 PM · Shared via AddThis · CDC Summary on FACEMASKS ; "from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018. In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51–1.20; I2 = 30%, p = 0.25) (Figure 2). One study evaluated the use of masks among pilgrims from Australia during the Hajj pilgrimage and reported no major difference in the risk for laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection in the control or mask group (33). Two studies in university settings assessed the effectiveness of face masks for primary protection by monitoring the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among student hall residents for 5 months (9,10). The overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the face mask group was not significant in either studies (9,10). Study designs in the 7 household studies were slightly different: 1 study provided face masks and P2 respirators for household contacts only (34), another study evaluated face mask use as a source control for infected persons only (35), and the remaining studies provided masks for the infected persons as well as their close contacts (11–13,15,17). None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group (11–13,15,17,34,35). Most studies were underpowered because of limited sample size, and some studies also reported suboptimal adherence in the face mask group."
CDC Summary on FACEMASKS ; "from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018. In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51–1.20; I2 = 30%, p = 0.25) (Figure 2). One study evaluated the use of masks among pilgrims from Australia during the Hajj pilgrimage and reported no major difference in the risk for laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection in the control or mask group (33). Two studies in university settings assessed the effectiveness of face masks for primary protection by monitoring the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among student hall residents for 5 months (9,10). The overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the face mask group was not significant in either studies (9,10). Study designs in the 7 household studies were slightly different: 1 study provided face masks and P2 respirators for household contacts only (34), another study evaluated face mask use as a source control for infected persons only (35), and the remaining studies provided masks for the infected persons as well as their close contacts (11–13,15,17). None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group (11–13,15,17,34,35). Most studies were underpowered because of limited sample size, and some studies also reported suboptimal adherence in the face mask group." WWWNC.CDC.GOV Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures
The data is in - mandatory lock downs have not had significant impact. ONLINELIBRARY.WILEY.COM Assessing Mandatory Stay‐at‐Home and Business Closure Effects on the Spread of COVID‐19
Don't think for yourself - Mommy knows best according to AMA president. They can monitor the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines but apparently you should trust that they are safe and effective becuase they said so even when there has, by definition, been no long term safety testing. AMA-ASSN.ORG AMA policy aimed at combatting misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines
Dear Patients, Happy New Year - 2021 is the year of awakening for those who remain alert. Be aware that this is already happening in Oregon for 16 year olds. Is it time to warn your friends who go to other pediatricians? Be on the lookout for emails and text messages from the office (active patients). If your child has not been seen in two years you would no longer be listed as active in the system and may not be getting important messages. MEDSCAPE.COM 11-Year-Olds Could Get Vaccines Without Parental Consent in DC
Thank-you Integrative Pediatrics family. We know the amazing health outcomes we are getting. Stay tuned at drpaulapproved.com and our usual channels for exciting announcement in the near future. NCQA.ORG Childhood Immunization Status - NCQA
Thank-you IP patients. This landmark study add vital information the world has been waiting for. Share widely. GREENMEDINFO.COM Can Vaccines Alter a Child’s Health Trajectory?

Information

Company name
Integrative Pediatrics
Category
Doctors

FAQs

  • What is the phone number for Integrative Pediatrics in Portland OR?
    You can reach them at: 503-643-2100. It’s best to call Integrative Pediatrics during business hours.
  • What is the address for Integrative Pediatrics on barnes in Portland?
    Integrative Pediatrics is located at this address: 11790 SW Barnes Rd Portland, OR 97225.
  • What are Integrative Pediatrics(Portland, OR) store hours?
    Integrative Pediatrics store hours are as follows: Mon-Fri: 8:00AM - 5:00PM, Sat-Sun: Closed.